Why is spontaneous generation incorrect




















A few years later he turned his inquisitive mind to spontaneous generation. Redi suspected creatures could not grow spontaneously from dirt and water; they needed to be born from other living things. To test his theory he created an ingeniously simple experiment in which he filled two jars with meat and then covered one with gauze. As the meat putrefied, maggots and flies appeared inside the uncovered jar while the covered jar remained free from insects.

The results were published in but to little effect. Although Redi was convinced insects could not pop out of dead animals, he was not so sure about what happened in living plants.

After observing insects burst from strange, bulbous growths galls on various types of vegetation, Redi concluded that plants were able to grow bugs in the same way they grew fruit. While Redi was a meticulous experimenter, he was far more reckless in other pursuits.

When contributing to a new edition of an Italian dictionary, Redi inserted words of his own invention. Other shenanigans were much more elaborate. Florentines took great pride in their city, and many local scholars, including Redi, went out of their way to bring attention to Florence. Such adoration may have inspired Redi to concoct a hoax in about the origin of eyeglasses.

Redi claimed that the original inventor had been rediscovered by a Florentine monk, Alessandro di Spina of Pisa also a complete fabrication. He allowed the broth to cool and placed it in a sealed flask. Needham also placed unheated broth in another container. Over time, both the heated broth and unheated broth contained microbes. Needham was convinced that his experiment had proven spontaneous generation in microbes. In , Italian biologist and priest Lazzaro Spallanzani, set out to demonstrate that microbes do not spontaneously generate.

He contended that microbes are capable of moving through the air. Spallanzani believed that microbes appeared in Needham's experiment because the broth had been exposed to air after boiling but before the flask had been sealed. Spallanzani devised an experiment where he placed the broth in a flask, sealed the flask, and removed the air from the flask before boiling. The results of his experiment showed that no microbes appeared in the broth as long as it remained in its sealed condition.

While it appeared that the results of this experiment had dealt a devastating blow to the idea of spontaneous generation in microbes, Needham argued that it was the removal of air from the flask that made spontaneous generation impossible. In , Louis Pasteur presented evidence that would virtually put an end to the debate.

He designed an experiment similar to Spallanzani's, however, Pasteur's experiment implemented a way to filter out microorganisms. Pasteur used a flask with a long, curved tube called a swan-necked flask. This flask allowed air to have access to the heated broth while trapping dust containing bacterial spores in the curved neck of the tube. The results of this experiment were that no microbes grew in the broth. Bacteria also appeared in the broth if the flask was broken near the neck allowing the broth to be exposed to non-filtered air.

This experiment demonstrated that bacteria appearing in broth are not the result of spontaneous generation. The majority of the scientific community considered this conclusive evidence against spontaneous generation and proof that living organisms only arise from living organisms.

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile. Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Create a personalised ads profile. Select personalised ads. Apply market research to generate audience insights. This theory persisted into the seventeenth century, when scientists undertook additional experimentation to support or disprove it.

By this time, the proponents of the theory cited how frogs simply seem to appear along the muddy banks of the Nile River in Egypt during the annual flooding. Others observed that mice simply appeared among grain stored in barns with thatched roofs. When the roof leaked and the grain molded, mice appeared. Jan Baptista van Helmont , a seventeenth century Flemish scientist, proposed that mice could arise from rags and wheat kernels left in an open container for 3 weeks.

In reality, such habitats provided ideal food sources and shelter for mouse populations to flourish. He predicted that preventing flies from having direct contact with the meat would also prevent the appearance of maggots. Redi left meat in each of six containers Figure 1. Two were open to the air, two were covered with gauze, and two were tightly sealed.

His hypothesis was supported when maggots developed in the uncovered jars, but no maggots appeared in either the gauze-covered or the tightly sealed jars.

He concluded that maggots could only form when flies were allowed to lay eggs in the meat, and that the maggots were the offspring of flies, not the product of spontaneous generation.

Figure 1. Maggots only appeared on the meat in the open container. However, maggots were also found on the gauze of the gauze-covered container. In , John Needham — published a report of his own experiments, in which he briefly boiled broth infused with plant or animal matter, hoping to kill all preexisting microbes.

After a few days, Needham observed that the broth had become cloudy and a single drop contained numerous microscopic creatures. He argued that the new microbes must have arisen spontaneously. In reality, however, he likely did not boil the broth enough to kill all preexisting microbes.

This suggested that microbes were introduced into these flasks from the air. Any subsequent sealing of the flasks then prevented new life force from entering and causing spontaneous generation Figure 2.

Figure 2. The debate over spontaneous generation continued well into the nineteenth century, with scientists serving as proponents of both sides.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000